Sorry I can’t tell you how good the article submitter side is as I have never tested it on its own, but the links do show up so I am guessing it does boost rankings. And hubs usually improve with low quality links as well so it may be great.

I am half way down page 1 for the main term for the Hub I wrote and the other 2 are history. Maybe it would be better for a higher spin percentage but I guess that my numbers were good enough.

I just go through the article and spin every word I possibly can. And hope the result is at least 50%, sometimes it is more. Thanks for signing up under my link, it is always much appreciated as I know that people do not have to do it. I guess the better the % the better it is but we also have weigh up the time involved as well.

So 1 article that is spun could be 100 unique articles or 2, depends how many time you tell it to spin. There is no other work involved at all. The drip rate is up to you for those spun articles, you just set the project to how you want it to run.

Hope that explains it, it is a very simple system once you just watch their video. Spin, submit, have a beer.

I’m looking into BLS and from what I’ve gathered, these are short articles that you write for links or “snippets”. Do you just use snippets or do you use actual articles of say, 300 words? You mentioned, or one of the commenters, that you can get 1000 links a month from BLS or something… does that mean you have to write 1000 short articles or at least spin that much? Or does 1 article you put into BLS give you tons of links? Just wondering if using something like BLS is going to be a ton of work or not.

Also, the drip rate you talked about, where you set to 25 a day, how many articles do you actually write to get that?

You steal someone else’s content and try to spin it and pass it off as your own… you’re going to hell. LOL.

Of course, this is my opinion, but it’s a strong one. I’ve thought about this for a while, after having bought into the whole sanctity of the web argument for a short while. Then reality returned and I remembered how things used to be before all the holier-than-thou bloggers decided the internet was a place where social justice should rule. We are individuals and it’s perfectly acceptable for us to each do whatever we want with our own creations (content, sites, blogs, etc) as long as we stay within the “real” rules — TOS, site specific guidelines, local laws, etc. Social mores on the internet have become ridiculously sanctimonious of late.

I remember when cross-posting was actually the norm and more than acceptable, and creating link directories was the be all and end all of having a complete site. Interconnectedness was important. Now everyone hoards links and uses rel=nofollow as a way to show superiority over another site. The first site I started over 10 years ago had its articles reprinted countless times, not because I submitted them somewhere, but because back then that’s how other people shared interesting content with their visitors. They asked to reprint your material and most of the time, you gave them a few guidelines and said, sure, just give me a link in return!

Seriously, there is NOTHING wrong with creating your own derivative works of your own material and then submitting those works to places where they’re actually asking–no, I would go so far as to say begging–for content.

Thanks for buying via my links, much appreciated. I know the $8 packet is mind numbingly boring, I do not look forward to doing it at all. Definitely needs to be automated if possible.

Thanks again
J